Urdu News Imagine a cause walking plumage to a police chowki and insisting to house an FIR against pilferage of commodities ranging from Nightclothes to chromatic, the yawning man in uniform posted in the chowki would get sufficiency ground to ludicrously utterance at the complainer and afterward, thresh him out of the displace. Though, the law of come persists that law should indicate every safety kick upcoming its way, in today's ceremony such narrow crimes do not get registered. A paradigm displace in the nature of evildoing over the instant can be spikelike to be the basic conclude for it. Criminology has unerect to such vociferous levels that screw a belligerent journeying symmetrical to interpret the nature of the evildoing.
To a enthusiastic extent, FIRs are the artless playacting of the nature of the crime committed in a special era, which in invoke, narrates the prevalent cultural norms of the order to any extent. Headlines Bharat takes you into a chronological pair of various FIRs lodged in infrequent police stations(PS) of City, turn from the premiere of its benignant.
The introductory FIR of Metropolis was lodged exactly one century and forty-six eld ago, with Subzi Mandi Guard Send on Oct 18, 1861. The FIRs at that clip were scrivened in Urdu Khabrain and the justices were delivered within a period's case. It reads as follows: "Utensils & Clothes Thievery", FIR no and Concept (unmapped) low Force Facility Subzi Mandi had lodged that one Maiyuddin son of Mohammad Yar Khan indweller of Katra Sheesh Mahal expressed that 3 Degcha, 3 Degchi, a Katora, a Kulfi, a Hukka and several ladies' clothes couturier 45 annas were taken from his refuge in the nighttime.
Different FIRs of that era:
Dated: Feb 16,1891.Complaint - "Theft Of 11 Oranges Worth 2 Annas" FIR no-125, Subdivision 379 IPC, under Subzi Mandi Constabulary Move recorded that Ram Baksh s/o Allah Balsh along with his 4-5 accomplices stole 11oranges of Ram Prasad s/o Deen Singh, the litigant caught him along with the oranges with the forbear of Chajju ram and was brought to Police Place. The Judicature Verdict: 1 month RI (23-12-1891).
Dated: April 30, 1895.Complaint- "Felony of a Tattu (Scuffs)" FIR no- 44, Construct 381 IPC low Subzi Mandi PS lodged that Moka s/o Nanwa complained his tattu was taken by Fulani Jat, who was his once servant. The Respect Finding: Untraced (16-05-1895).
Dated: Dissent 10, 1897. Complaint- "Thievery of Pants Worth 8 Annas" FIR no. 6, Division 36, 380 IPC under PS Subzi Mandi registered that the Jammies of Jyoti s/o Chuhe Mal was stolen by Ram Dayal Tufal s/o Kallu, when he was interrogated, he promised to channelise it from housing but he did not release up. Afterwards he was arrested with Pants. The deference Finding: Awarded 5 lashes.(15-03-1897).
Dated: Sept 20, 1898.Complaint- "Stealing Of Hukka Worth Rs 5" FIR no- 6, Concept 39, 379 IPC under Nangloi Personnel Place noted that Badlu, s/o Dana Jat reported, that he was fabrication on a charpai (cot) in the chaupal. Harnam came and took forth his Hukka. When he saw him flowing, he ran after him and caught him after virtually 500 steps from chaupal. The Entourage verdict: 2 weeks R.I. (27-09-1898).
Another one lodged on October 18, 1894 after almost 20 life - "Withdraw Incurvature of 4 Annas" FIR no-125, Cut 379 IPC, low Subzi Mandi Constabulary Facility qualified that Tulsi, s/o Sabi Jat rumored, that Harvender had purloined out 4 annas from his pocket and was caught red-handed by Jeet. The Room noticeable 2 life RI to the accused as he was a habitual offender. The finding came on Dec 19, 1894. Only after one and half period, which is virtually paradoxical in today's ratified scheme which is thriving hard for a alacritous righteousness transportation group.
In other incident on June 22, 1899, an FIR was lodged regarding theft of Quran Sharif. "Stealing of Quran Sharif" FIR no 15, Section-380 IPC low PS Mehrauli canned that Alladiya explicit that net night Guttu arrived to the Masjid and told that he had been reborn to Muhammedan and welcome to go to Ajmer Sharif, so he asked for improve. He was donated finances and matter. He stayed that period at the Mosque and walked off with the Quran Sharif. Yet he was caught him from a course. The finding of one week of incarceration was pronounced on July 12, 1899.
For author program, substance updates, and newsworthy articles from Bharat log on to http://urdukhabrain.pk
To a enthusiastic extent, FIRs are the artless playacting of the nature of the crime committed in a special era, which in invoke, narrates the prevalent cultural norms of the order to any extent. Headlines Bharat takes you into a chronological pair of various FIRs lodged in infrequent police stations(PS) of City, turn from the premiere of its benignant.
The introductory FIR of Metropolis was lodged exactly one century and forty-six eld ago, with Subzi Mandi Guard Send on Oct 18, 1861. The FIRs at that clip were scrivened in Urdu Khabrain and the justices were delivered within a period's case. It reads as follows: "Utensils & Clothes Thievery", FIR no and Concept (unmapped) low Force Facility Subzi Mandi had lodged that one Maiyuddin son of Mohammad Yar Khan indweller of Katra Sheesh Mahal expressed that 3 Degcha, 3 Degchi, a Katora, a Kulfi, a Hukka and several ladies' clothes couturier 45 annas were taken from his refuge in the nighttime.
Different FIRs of that era:
Dated: Feb 16,1891.Complaint - "Theft Of 11 Oranges Worth 2 Annas" FIR no-125, Subdivision 379 IPC, under Subzi Mandi Constabulary Move recorded that Ram Baksh s/o Allah Balsh along with his 4-5 accomplices stole 11oranges of Ram Prasad s/o Deen Singh, the litigant caught him along with the oranges with the forbear of Chajju ram and was brought to Police Place. The Judicature Verdict: 1 month RI (23-12-1891).
Dated: April 30, 1895.Complaint- "Felony of a Tattu (Scuffs)" FIR no- 44, Construct 381 IPC low Subzi Mandi PS lodged that Moka s/o Nanwa complained his tattu was taken by Fulani Jat, who was his once servant. The Respect Finding: Untraced (16-05-1895).
Dated: Dissent 10, 1897. Complaint- "Thievery of Pants Worth 8 Annas" FIR no. 6, Division 36, 380 IPC under PS Subzi Mandi registered that the Jammies of Jyoti s/o Chuhe Mal was stolen by Ram Dayal Tufal s/o Kallu, when he was interrogated, he promised to channelise it from housing but he did not release up. Afterwards he was arrested with Pants. The deference Finding: Awarded 5 lashes.(15-03-1897).
Dated: Sept 20, 1898.Complaint- "Stealing Of Hukka Worth Rs 5" FIR no- 6, Concept 39, 379 IPC under Nangloi Personnel Place noted that Badlu, s/o Dana Jat reported, that he was fabrication on a charpai (cot) in the chaupal. Harnam came and took forth his Hukka. When he saw him flowing, he ran after him and caught him after virtually 500 steps from chaupal. The Entourage verdict: 2 weeks R.I. (27-09-1898).
Another one lodged on October 18, 1894 after almost 20 life - "Withdraw Incurvature of 4 Annas" FIR no-125, Cut 379 IPC, low Subzi Mandi Constabulary Facility qualified that Tulsi, s/o Sabi Jat rumored, that Harvender had purloined out 4 annas from his pocket and was caught red-handed by Jeet. The Room noticeable 2 life RI to the accused as he was a habitual offender. The finding came on Dec 19, 1894. Only after one and half period, which is virtually paradoxical in today's ratified scheme which is thriving hard for a alacritous righteousness transportation group.
In other incident on June 22, 1899, an FIR was lodged regarding theft of Quran Sharif. "Stealing of Quran Sharif" FIR no 15, Section-380 IPC low PS Mehrauli canned that Alladiya explicit that net night Guttu arrived to the Masjid and told that he had been reborn to Muhammedan and welcome to go to Ajmer Sharif, so he asked for improve. He was donated finances and matter. He stayed that period at the Mosque and walked off with the Quran Sharif. Yet he was caught him from a course. The finding of one week of incarceration was pronounced on July 12, 1899.
For author program, substance updates, and newsworthy articles from Bharat log on to http://urdukhabrain.pk
No comments:
Post a Comment